Mgr. Jana Janics Bajánková

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Bratislava, we register 340 hearings and 70 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava I, we register 1,598 hearings and 840 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 10 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014 and 2013.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 4

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 814 days in the period and was assigned on average 12 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 16.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 539 – 548. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 82.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 75
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 62

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 1239.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 462 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 389 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 84.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 130.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 367 days in the period and was assigned on average 20 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 18.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 507 – 524. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 6.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 83.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 30
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 25

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 704 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 550 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 248 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 45.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 89.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Pracovné právo
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Neplatnosť skončenia pracovného pomeru
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie vlast. k les.… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o určenie skončenia… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, PR 604,46 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, neúčinnosť právneho úkonu Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie, že k skončeniu… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 1.205,84 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, uznanie cudzieho rozhodnutia Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, uznanie cudzieho rozhodnutia Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Návrh na uznanie cudzieho… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 775,98 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.