JUDr. Monika Šabľová

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 105 hearings and 162 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Košice okolie, we register 183 hearings and no judgements.
  3. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 1,710 hearings and 1,498 judgements.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014 and 2013.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 990 days in the period and was assigned on average 92 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 285 – 316. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 129
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 93

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 247.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 200 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 125 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 62.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 114.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 576 days in the period and was assigned on average 66 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 4.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 736 – 737. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 1.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 51.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 39
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 20

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 594 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 410 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 220 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 53.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 34.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 219 days and on average was assigned 122 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 70% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 10
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 7

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 3,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Opravné uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Oddĺženie
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Incidenčné spory
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Oddĺženie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Oddĺženie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 12.500 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie zmluvnej pokuty v… Hearing will be held on

  3. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, o vydanie veci Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 254,17 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 7902,48 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 1402,76 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, Zaplatenie 6 471,46 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 234.968,97 eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 234.968,97 eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie oddlženia pre… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie oddĺženia pre… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vydanie veci Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 47773,59 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na zrušenie odllženia pre… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.