JUDr. Paulína Pacherová

  1. Active judicial council chairman at the court Krajský súd Bratislava, we register 91 hearings and 126 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava II, we register 840 hearings and 903 judgements.
    Note: - od 1. júla 2016 do 30. júna 2017 je dočasne pridelená na KS v Bratislave.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 19 years.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 23 years, 4 - ročný mandát.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 976 days in the period and was assigned on average 39 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 21 from 40 possible points and ranked on 390 – 416. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 65.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 84
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 55

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 461 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 235 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 104 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 44.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 113.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 664 days and on average was assigned 62 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 53,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 45
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 24

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 4,2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 278 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 167 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 103 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 46% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 91,6% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 18,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 490 – 500. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 5,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 13,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Znížený nápad v agende Cb z dôvodu vybavovania agendy Er.
  • 2013 – Sudca sa zúčastnil na vzdelávacích aktivitách 2x.
  • 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnej vzdelávacej aktivity.
  • 2012 – Sudca mal. v odd.Cb,CbHs, znížený nápad
  • 2011 – sudca sa 1x zúčastnil vzdelávacej aktivity organizovanej Justičnou akadémiou; 2012 – Sudca sa nezúčastnil žiadnej vzdelávacej aktivity.; 2013 – Sudca sa zúčastnil na vzdelávacích aktivitách 2x.
  • 2011 – sudca sa 1x zúčastnil vzdelávacej aktivity organizovanej Justičnou akadémiou
  • 2011 – sudca do 31.05.2011 vybavoval agendu Er. Od 01.06.2011 vybavuje aj agendu Cb, CbHs, a z dôvodu , že vybavuje aj agendu Er, v oddeleniach Cb, a CbHs má znížený nápad; 2012 – Sudca mal. v odd.Cb,CbHs, znížený nápad; 2013 – Znížený nápad v agende Cb z dôvodu vybavovania agendy Er.
  • 2011 – sudca do 31.05.2011 vybavoval agendu Er. Od 01.06.2011 vybavuje aj agendu Cb, CbHs, a z dôvodu , že vybavuje aj agendu Er, v oddeleniach Cb, a CbHs má znížený nápad

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Konkurz
    Potvrdzujúce
    Decree Past

  2. Opravné uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Decree Past

  3. Rozsudok – Oddĺženie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Decree Past

  4. Rozsudok – Oddĺženie
    Potvrdzujúce
    Decree Past

  5. Rozsudok Decree Past

  6. Uznesenie
    Zastavujúce odvolacie konanie
    Decree Past

  7. Uznesenie
    Zastavujúce odvolacie konanie
    Decree Past

  8. Uznesenie – Incidenčné spory
    Zrušujúce
    Decree Past

  9. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Potvrdzujúce
    Decree Past

  10. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Potvrdzujúce
    Decree Past

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vylúčenie veci z konkurznej… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie oddlženia Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyhlásenie vykonateľnosti… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie oddlženia Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie zmluvnej pokuty 12… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, odporovacia žaloba konkurzného… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie oddlženia pre… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie oddĺženia Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vylúčenie veci z konkurznej… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vyslovenie právnej neúčinnosti Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie neúčinnosti právneho… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.