JUDr. Oľga Bitalová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa, we register 1,619 hearings and 2,450 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 24 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for about 28 years, 4 - ročný mandát.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1171 days in the period and was assigned on average 64 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 13.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 594 – 602. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 6 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 153
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 101

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 537.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 243 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 102 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 42% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 76.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 813 days in the period and was assigned on average 42 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 366. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 68.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 112
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 77

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 203 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 313 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 56 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 17.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 84.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2012:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 413 days and on average was assigned 48 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda

Similar court
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 62,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 37
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 23

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 13% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 4,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – §35 ods. 3
  • 2011 – § 35 ods. 3; 2012 – §35 ods. 3
  • 2011 – § 35 ods. 3
  • 2011 – 4.5.2011
  • 2011 – 4.5.2011

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zaplatenie 20400,00 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na začatie konania o… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zaplatenie 663,88 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti kúpnej… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na začatie konania o… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zaplatenie 20400,00 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na začatie konania o… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 289 ods. 2… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.