Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 823 days in the period and was assigned on average 39 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 25.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 133 – 155. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 78.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 146 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 90 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 38 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 42.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 110.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 539 days and on average was assigned 132 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 57,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 2,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 0 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 0 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.