JUDr. Sandra Veľká

  1. Active judicial council member at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 3,299 hearings and 2,360 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Krajský súd Košice, we register 182 hearings and no judgements.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 62.88% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 229 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 66.98% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 412 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 288 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 288. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 228 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 29.39% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 7
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1382 days in the period and was assigned on average 16 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 20 from 40 possible points and ranked on 389 – 410. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 155
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 94

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 339.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 144 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 117 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 81.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 298.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 6
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 997 days in the period and was assigned on average 19 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 492 – 506. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 104
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 62

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 332 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 481 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 222 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 46.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 104.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 608 days and on average was assigned 185 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 55% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 60
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 33

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,5%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 479 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 509 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 268 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 49,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 99% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 13,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 663 – 669. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 6,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 6,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – Opatrením predsedu súdu z r. 2011 s účinnosťou od 1.1.2012 bol znížený nápad v registri C na 60% z dôvodu vyrovnania zaťaženosti sudcov, nakoľko v roku 2011 bolo sudkyni pridelených viac veci ako v iných súdnych oddeleniach registra C.
  • 2012 – Opatrením predsedu súdu z r. 2011 s účinnosťou od 1.1.2012 bol znížený nápad v registri C na 60% z dôvodu vyrovnania zaťaženosti sudcov, nakoľko v roku 2011 bolo sudkyni pridelených viac veci ako v iných súdnych oddeleniach registra C.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie nemajetkovej ujmy… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 24 329,76 EUR s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 500,- EUR Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie lastníckeho práva Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 370,- EUR s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhrada škody Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1.305,00 EUR s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vypratanie nebyt.… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 22 859,77 EUR s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 20.000,- EUR s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, neexistenciu záložného práva… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 862,- EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1.775,76 EUR s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 732,84 EUR s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 6.076,37 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 182.278,58 EUR s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 13.711,20 EUR s prísl.… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.