Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from family agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from family agenda.
We register 62.01% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 379 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 104.17% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 143 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 250 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 224.08. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 106 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 41.51% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 1490 days in the period and was assigned on average 116 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 18.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 464 – 477. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 65.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 276.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 235 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 152 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 64.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 103% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 1072 days in the period and was assigned on average 86 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 18.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 507 – 524. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 295 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 369 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 143 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 80.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 1.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.
The judge in this period worked 216 days and on average was assigned 174 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 82,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.
Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.