Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.
We register 64.15% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 544 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 51.64% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 548 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 220 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 220. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 294 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 31.63% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1530 days in the period and was assigned on average 17 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 21.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 317 – 344. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 5.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 355.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 146 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 99 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 67.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 223.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 1093 days in the period and was assigned on average 19 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 18 from 40 possible points and ranked on 525 – 541. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 340 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 449 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 133 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 29.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 77% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 215 days and on average was assigned 107 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 65,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 19,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 6,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.
Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.