JUDr. Dagmar Soliarová

  1. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 4,058 hearings and 2,319 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1427 days in the period and was assigned on average 121 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 18 from 40 possible points and ranked on 478 – 505. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 9 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 71.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 201
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 144

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 350.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 240 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 140 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 58.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 85.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1052 days in the period and was assigned on average 89 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 21.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 367 – 389. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 71.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 145
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 104

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 249 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 336 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 139 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 41.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 86.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 206 days and on average was assigned 186 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 75% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 36
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 27

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 9,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2011 – Dvojdňový seminár – opatrovnícka agenda, Omšenie, apríl 2011,
  • 2011 – Dvojdňový seminár – opatrovnícka agenda, Omšenie, apríl 2011,

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Zodpovednosť za škodu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava práv a poviností k… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie času splatnosti… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava styku so starými… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zníženie výživného + NO Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zníženie výživného + NO Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného na… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na úpravu práv a… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.