JUDr. Erik Uhlár

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa, we register 3,071 hearings and 2,649 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 13 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 72.28% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 184 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 111.11% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 209 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 130 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 140.749. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 71 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 80.28% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1278 days in the period and was assigned on average 57 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 21.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 317 – 344. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 77.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 119
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 92

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 212.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 110 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 86 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 78.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 95.5% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 884 days in the period and was assigned on average 40 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 27.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 119 – 133. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 74.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 79
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 59

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 198 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 140 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 110 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 78.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 120.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2012:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 438 days and on average was assigned 194 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 15
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 9

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 1,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 0,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 22.11.2012
  • 2012 – 0
  • 2011 – 0; 2012 – 22.11.2012
  • 2011 – 0; 2012 – 0
  • 2011 – 0
  • 2011 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 207, ods. 1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Uhlár
    Defendant – D. V.
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 221, ods. 1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Uhlár
    Defendant – B. V.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 326, §225 Tr.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Uhlár
    Defendant – D. P.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 208 ods. 1 písm.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Uhlár
    Defendant – U. E.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, trestný čin § 248a ods.… Hearing was held on

  6. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin § 189 ods. 1… Hearing was held on

  7. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, zločin § 189 ods. 1… Hearing was held on

  8. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin § 240 ods. 1… Hearing was held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, trestný čin § 250 ods.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Uhlár
    Defendant – M. H.
  10. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 213 ods. 1 a 2… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Stará Ľubovňa
    Judge – JUDr. Erik Uhlár
    Defendant – N. V.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.