JUDr. Júlia Weiserová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Spišská Nová Ves, we register 3,010 hearings and 7,221 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 16 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1477 days in the period and was assigned on average 51 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 411 – 435. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 212
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 133

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 205.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 118 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 45 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 38.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 95.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1059 days in the period and was assigned on average 41 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 15.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 601 – 622. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 48.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 111
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 54

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 238 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 375 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 195 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 52% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 93.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 652 days and on average was assigned 182 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 63,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 36
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 23

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 3,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 228 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 279 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 223 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 71% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 109,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 19,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 473 – 480. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 10,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Sudkyňa sa zúčastňovala na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách
  • 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastňoval na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách; 2013 – Sudkyňa sa zúčastňovala na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách
  • 2012 – Sudca sa zúčastňoval na všetkých vzdelávacích aktivitách
  • 2012 – Nápad za rok 2012 bol zvýšený
  • 2012 – Nápad za rok 2012 bol zvýšený

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Exekúcia a výkon rozhodnutí
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o ochranu osobnosti Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1528,69 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 209,02 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 131,72 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Rozvod Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zrušenie výživného pre plnoleté… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 9276,04 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 70,7 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 70,7 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Ž A L O B A o zrušene a… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, 10,00 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zníženie výživného Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na určenie otcovstva a… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 981,64 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie otcovstva Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 70,7 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.