Mgr. Peter Revický

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Prešov, we register 1,155 hearings and 1,966 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 6 years.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 4
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 813 days in the period and was assigned on average 17 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 23 from 40 possible points and ranked on 244 – 268. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 81.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 74
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 60

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 560.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 244 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 221 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 90.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 305.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 357 days in the period and was assigned on average 30 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 467 – 491. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 90.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 44
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 40

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 561 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 626 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 272 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 43.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 70.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neplatnosti výpovede… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie sumy vo… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu škody Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o ochranu osobnosti Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vyporiadanie BSM Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vyporiadanie BSM Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 180.15 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, návrh na vydanie platobného… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o 148,28 Eur s príslušenstvom. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1240,66 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 5482.62 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie sumy vo… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 3633,71 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie neplatnosti výpovede… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 2.315,05 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu škody Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.