Mgr. Ivana Dufalová

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava III, we register 3,489 hearings and 1,954 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 24 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for about 28 years, 4 - ročný mandát.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is excellent.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from business agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from business agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 80.00% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 250 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 131.75% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 289 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 332 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 332. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 267 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 56.55% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1458 days in the period and was assigned on average 107 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 113 – 132. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 80.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 176
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 141

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 310.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 480 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 146 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 30.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 119.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1042 days in the period and was assigned on average 62 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 366. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 78.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 95
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 75

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 299 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 383 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 126 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 32.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 81.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 625 days and on average was assigned 74 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 81,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 55
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 45

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 12,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 210 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 91 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 95 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 50,8% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 74,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 164 – 177. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 13,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 20.6.–21.6.2013–Ochrana osobnosti; 21.10.–22.10.2013–Priemyselné práva, nekalá súťaž; 18.3–19.3.2013–Aplikácia práva EÚ v praxi;
  • 2012 – 13.3–14.3.2012 – Profesionálna etika sudcu, 29.2–1.3.2012 – Právny styk s cudzinou, doručovanie, 14.6.–15.6.2012 – Ochrana osobnosti, judikatúra ESĽP12.–13.12.2012 – Princípy vnútroštátnej politiky EÚ, 12.–13.4.2012 – Prehľad akt. judikatúry v obchodnom práve, 26.–27.11.2012 – Obchodné spoločnosti v rámci EÚ, 18.–19.12.2012 – Aplikácia práva EÚ
  • 2011 – Obchodno–záväzkové vzťahy – 1 deň Postavenie sudcu – 2 dni Obchodné právo – 2 dni Právomoc, výkon rozhodnutí – 1 deň Prehľad aktuálnej judikatúry v oblasti civ. práva – 1 deň ESĽP, Štrasburg, Luxemburg – 3 dni ; 2012 – 13.3–14.3.2012 – Profesionálna etika sudcu, 29.2–1.3.2012 – Právny styk s cudzinou, doručovanie, 14.6.–15.6.2012 – Ochrana osobnosti, judikatúra ESĽP12.–13.12.2012 – Princípy vnútroštátnej politiky EÚ, 12.–13.4.2012 – Prehľad akt. judikatúry v obchodnom práve, 26.–27.11.2012 – Obchodné spoločnosti v rámci EÚ, 18.–19.12.2012 – Aplikácia práva EÚ; 2013 – 20.6.–21.6.2013–Ochrana osobnosti; 21.10.–22.10.2013–Priemyselné práva, nekalá súťaž; 18.3–19.3.2013–Aplikácia práva EÚ v praxi;
  • 2011 – Obchodno–záväzkové vzťahy – 1 deň Postavenie sudcu – 2 dni Obchodné právo – 2 dni Právomoc, výkon rozhodnutí – 1 deň Prehľad aktuálnej judikatúry v oblasti civ. práva – 1 deň ESĽP, Štrasburg, Luxemburg – 3 dni

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok pre uznanie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 3 500,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie zmenkového PR pre 12… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 5.869,20 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 46 858,24 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 8 572,55 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 76965,7 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 716,11 Eur Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 5265 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 3820,8 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 29046,66 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.