JUDr. Zuzana Kotríková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Prievidza, we register 3,214 hearings and 4,553 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 12 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 73.08% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 182 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 110.80% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 186 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 236 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 227.587. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 118 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 17.80% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 758 days in the period and was assigned on average 33 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24 from 40 possible points and ranked on 201 – 223. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 69% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 71
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 49

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 221.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 126 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 50 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 39.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 167.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Ostatné – Starostlivosť o maloletých…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Ostatné – Starostlivosť o maloletých…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých – Vyživovacie…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Ostatné – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zníženie výživného Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, osvojenie malol. dieťaťa Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zverenie do osobnej… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zverenie malol. dieťaťa do… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obmedzenie spôsobilosti na… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, obmedzenie spôsobilosti na… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena rozhodnutia+NO Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie výchovného opatrenia Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie výživného na rozvedenú… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zníženie výživného Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, schválenie právneho úkonu Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie ústavnej… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, obmedzenie spôsobilosti na… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, ustanovenie kolízneho… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.