JUDr. Anna Frigová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bardejov, we register 840 hearings and 4,038 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Svidník, we register 3,535 hearings and no judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 20 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 82.45% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 359 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 97.07% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 322 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 397 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 249.58. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 340 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 43.53% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2012:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 447 days and on average was assigned 190 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 76,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 34
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 26

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Schválenie právneho úkonu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Schválenie právneho úkonu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Vyhlásenie za mŕtveho
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Opatrovníctvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4000 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zvýšenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o schválenie právneho úkonu… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zmenu úpravy styku Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyhlásenie za mŕtveho Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyhlásenie za mŕtveho Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zverenie maloletej do NOS Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zapretie otcovstva Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena úpravy styku Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 4000 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o ustanovenie poručníka Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 71402,91 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.