Mgr. Michal Kačáni

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Bratislava, we register 263 hearings and no judgements.
    Note: Ďalšie tituly: PhD.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava I, we register 1,278 hearings and 597 judgements.
    Note: Ďalšie tituly: PhD.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 13 years.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 985 days in the period and was assigned on average 51 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 30 from 40 possible points and ranked on 28 – 33. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 91.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 94
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 86

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 126.8 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 74 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 31 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 41.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 101.9% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 579 days in the period and was assigned on average 31 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 34.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 6 – 8. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 15 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 93% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 57
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 53

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 91 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 57 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 25 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 43.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 118.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 144 days and on average was assigned 55 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 238 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 41 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 4 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 9,5% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 79,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár – 3
  • 2013 – Seminár – 3

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozhodnutie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – N. F., R. W., T. V., and Z. S.
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – G. H., P. S., R. J., and X. O.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – A. Y., E. R., R. W., and S. Z.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – B. M., I. U., N. R., and X. C.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – A. F., U. O., and V. D.
  6. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – B. K., F. I., Q. H., and T. A.
  7. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – H. A., K. H., O. T., and V. M.
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, §9 ods.2, §252 ods.1… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Bratislava
    Judge – Mgr. Michal Kačáni
    Defendants – E. J., L. G., T. B., and Z. R.
  9. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, Rozhodovanie o… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin: marenie výkonu… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.