JUDr. Martin Lopuch, PhD.

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Michalovce, we register 1,305 hearings and 1,293 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 26 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 30 years, 4 - ročný mandát.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1056 days in the period and was assigned on average 8 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 17 from 40 possible points and ranked on 557 – 575. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 57.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 104
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 60

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 344 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 280 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 123 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 43.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 100% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 646 days and on average was assigned 64 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 55,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 69
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 38

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 15,8% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 7,1%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 370 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 146 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 105 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 58% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 105,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 16 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 600 – 606. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 3 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 13 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – podpredseda súdu
  • 2012 – Podpredseda súdu
  • 2012 – 6.12.2012 – odborný seminár sudcov (Krajský súd v Košiciach)
  • 2012 – 6.12.2012 – odborný seminár sudcov (Krajský súd v Košiciach)
  • 2011 – Od 1.5.2011 znížený nápad na 50% C, Cd, Ccud, Ro, Er, Erd, Ercud z dôvodu výkonu funkcie podpredsedu súdu.; 2012 – Podpredseda súdu; 2013 – podpredseda súdu
  • 2011 – Od 1.5.2011 znížený nápad na 50% C, Cd, Ccud, Ro, Er, Erd, Ercud z dôvodu výkonu funkcie podpredsedu súdu.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Záložné právo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie vlastníckeho práva k… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, ochrana osobnosti Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1562,86 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 473,75 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 105,75 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 609,97 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1 150,72 € s… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, náhrada škody -… Hearing will be held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 58,76 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, ochrana osobnosti Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie 7 000,00… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníckeho práva… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie 2 585,92… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 288,11 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, 152,71 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 146 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 1770,67 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, 477,23 Eur s príslušenstvom Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 119,2 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.