Mgr. Janette Nôtová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Zvolen, we register 3,870 hearings and 3,295 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 19 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 63.14% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 369 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 94.91% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 185 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 261 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 250.956. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 135 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 20.74% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.NA.

The judge worked 1459 days in the period and was assigned on average 73 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 21 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 368. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 57.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 260
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 149

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.4%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 234.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 164 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 89 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 54.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 186.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1042 days in the period and was assigned on average 66 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 15 from 40 possible points and ranked on 623 – 638. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 51.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 201
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 104

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 5.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 351 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 461 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 115 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 24.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 87.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 617 days and on average was assigned 133 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 51% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 100
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 51

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 174 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 140 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 82 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 47,4% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 108,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 21,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 346 – 354. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 6 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 15,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 25. 04. – 26. 04. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie sudcov banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie; 17. 10. – 18. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie OPK banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie; 21. 10. – 22. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie TPK banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie;
  • 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22..05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen, 04. – 05. 10. 2012 – rokovanie trestnoprávneho kolégia
  • 2011 – Účasť na zasadnutí trestnoprávneho kolégia – 2 dni; 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22..05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen, 04. – 05. 10. 2012 – rokovanie trestnoprávneho kolégia; 2013 – 25. 04. – 26. 04. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie sudcov banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie; 17. 10. – 18. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie OPK banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie; 21. 10. – 22. 10. 2013 Pracovné stretnutie TPK banskobystrického kraja, Omšenie;
  • 2011 – Účasť na zasadnutí trestnoprávneho kolégia – 2 dni
  • 2011 – ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––; 2013 – –––
  • 2011 – ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, ochranu osobnosti o zaplatenie… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, obmedzenie spôsobilosti na… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 1 005,36 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, obmedzenie spôsobilosti na… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 2.680,-- Eur s… Hearing was held on

  7. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydanie veci Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie bezpodielového… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie neplatnosti darovacej… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.