JUDr. Elena Petrusová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Lučenec, we register 80 hearings and 44 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Veľký Krtíš, we register 2,697 hearings and 2,214 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is low.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 62.04% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 353 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 45.12% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 195 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 97 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 97. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 119 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 15.97% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1446 days in the period and was assigned on average 18 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 436 – 463. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 62.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 236
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 148

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 315.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 83 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 51 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 61.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 162.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1025 days in the period and was assigned on average 21 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 168 – 193. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 20 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 61.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 178
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 109

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 189 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 375 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 79 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 21.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 116.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 626 days and on average was assigned 138 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 73,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 86
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 63

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 260 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 206 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 82 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 31,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 88,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 24 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 203 – 218. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 15 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – od 01. 11. 2013 – 30. 11.2013 ako podpredsedníčka vykonávala z dôvodu úmrtia JUDr. Milana Růžičku dňa 29. 10. 2013 úlohy predsedu súdu
  • 2013 – od 01. 11. 2013 – 30. 11.2013 ako podpredsedníčka vykonávala z dôvodu úmrtia JUDr. Milana Růžičku dňa 29. 10. 2013 úlohy predsedu súdu
  • 2013 – 2 školenia
  • 2012 – 2 školenia
  • 2011 – 3 školenia; 2012 – 2 školenia; 2013 – 2 školenia
  • 2011 – 3 školenia

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozhodnutie – Povolenie uzavrieť manželstvo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozhodnutie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozhodnutie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vyporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 63,40 EUR istiny s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o schválenie právneho úkonu Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na vydanie platobného… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie výchovného… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradnú starostlivosť a… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zmenu úpravy rodičovských… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vyživovacej… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o splnenie podmienok… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, bezdôvodné obohatenie -… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.