JUDr. Katarína Podhorcová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Liptovský Mikuláš, we register 3,574 hearings and 2,863 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from family agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from family agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 55.70% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 228 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 110.89% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 186 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 224 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 200.416. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 118 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 37.29% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1294 days in the period and was assigned on average 96 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 17 from 40 possible points and ranked on 525 – 538. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 58% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 169
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 98

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 312.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 231 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 95 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 41.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 97.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 899 days in the period and was assigned on average 67 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 417 – 443. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 114
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 69

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 367 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 239 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 106 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 44.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 108.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 541 days and on average was assigned 109 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 50% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 44
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 22

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,8%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 465 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 246 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 176 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 71,3% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 93,7% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 15,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 621 – 630. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 7,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 6.3.2013 – KS B.B. – efekt. využ. PC 9.–10.12.2013 – JA Omšenie – prac.stret–.trestné právo
  • 2012 – 15.3.2012– Omšenie – Seminár – Európsky zatýkací rozkaz 11.6.2012– ČR– Kroměříš – Seminár _ Nedbalostné TČ 24.9.2012 – Omšenie – Seminár –Ukladanie a VT a ochr. opatrenia 10.12.2012 – Omšenie– Seminár – Vyhl.,výklad a aplik. práva EU
  • 2011 – 18.212011 – Trestnoprávne grémium 8.9.2011 – Trestnoprávne grémium; 2012 – 15.3.2012– Omšenie – Seminár – Európsky zatýkací rozkaz 11.6.2012– ČR– Kroměříš – Seminár _ Nedbalostné TČ 24.9.2012 – Omšenie – Seminár –Ukladanie a VT a ochr. opatrenia 10.12.2012 – Omšenie– Seminár – Vyhl.,výklad a aplik. práva EU; 2013 – 6.3.2013 – KS B.B. – efekt. využ. PC 9.–10.12.2013 – JA Omšenie – prac.stret–.trestné právo
  • 2011 – 18.212011 – Trestnoprávne grémium 8.9.2011 – Trestnoprávne grémium

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Ústavná starostlivosť – Starostlivosť…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Výchovné opatrenia
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Schválenie právneho úkonu
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na úpravu výkonu… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na zmenu obmedzenia… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na úpravu výkonu rodič.… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na zmenu úpravy výkonu rodič.… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na zníženie výživného… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na zrušenievyživovacej… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zmenu osobnej… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na rozvod manželstva Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na výkon rozhodnutia Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, návrh na zmenu osobnej… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie výživného na čas do… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Zrušenie výchovného opatrenia… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na zapretie otcovstva Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na rozvod manželstva s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na zníženie výživného a… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na zapretie otcovstva Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na ustanovenie… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na obmedzenie… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Návrh na zapretie otcovstva Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.