JUDr. Janka Pravotiaková

  1. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 1,234 hearings and 3,108 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 29 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from business agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from business agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 55.17% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 145 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 119.25% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 355 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 223 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 206.739. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 208 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 53.37% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1329 days in the period and was assigned on average 46 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 16 from 40 possible points and ranked on 549 – 560. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 55.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 88
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 49

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 351 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 176 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 83 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 47.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 134.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 911 days in the period and was assigned on average 34 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 22 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 366. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 51% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 49
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 25

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 251 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 136 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 35 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 25.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 117.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 479 days and on average was assigned 73 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 35% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 20
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 7

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 8,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 287 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 89 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 27 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 24,3% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 98,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 19,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 458 – 472. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 2 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 17,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 28.2.2013 Určovacie žaloby 16.10.2013 Dokazovanie, doručovanie v civilnom konaní.
  • 2012 – 13.9.2012 – Najnovšia judikatúra ESĽP – civilný úsek 17.10.2012 – Technika pojednávania, konanie na súde.
  • 2011 – Práceneschopnosť sudcu od 5.10.2011 – naďalej pokračuje.
  • 2011 – Práceneschopnosť sudcu od 5.10.2011 – naďalej pokračuje.
  • 2011 – 8.3.2011 Aplikačné právo OSP.; 2012 – 13.9.2012 – Najnovšia judikatúra ESĽP – civilný úsek 17.10.2012 – Technika pojednávania, konanie na súde.; 2013 – 28.2.2013 Určovacie žaloby 16.10.2013 Dokazovanie, doručovanie v civilnom konaní.
  • 2011 – 8.3.2011 Aplikačné právo OSP.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 44.900,00 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zrušenie oddlženia pre… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie oddlženia Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie oddlženia pre… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 3000 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 44.900,00 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 8232,63 Eur… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie 882,41 EUR… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 143,34 € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, nariadenie neodkladného… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.