JUDr. Miroslav Račko

  1. Active chairman at the court Okresný súd Lučenec, we register 2,084 hearings and 2,803 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 27 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 74.87% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 390 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 104.73% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 49 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 155 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 114.062. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 20 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 20.00% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1582 days in the period and was assigned on average 64 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 28 from 40 possible points and ranked on 62 – 68. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 312
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 237

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 109.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 97 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 24 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 24.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 116.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge did not issue judgements in any agenda dominantly..

The judge worked 1100 days in the period and was assigned on average 43 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 32.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 18 – 21. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 22 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 75% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 208
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 156

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 13% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 98 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 164 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 63 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 38.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 128.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 657 days and on average was assigned 120 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 85
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 51

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 13,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 297 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 215 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 123 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 50,6% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 94,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 17,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 556 – 573. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 12,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 19.04.2013 – Občianskoprávne grémium 25.04.2013 – 26.04.2013 Pracovné stretnutie sudcov KS BB 17.10.2013 – 18.10.2013 – Rokovanie obchodnoprávneho kolégia
  • 2012 – 0 dní
  • 2011 – 0; 2012 – 0 dní; 2013 – 19.04.2013 – Občianskoprávne grémium 25.04.2013 – 26.04.2013 Pracovné stretnutie sudcov KS BB 17.10.2013 – 18.10.2013 – Rokovanie obchodnoprávneho kolégia
  • 2011 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Račko
    Defendant – G. M.
  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 34479,34 Eur Hearing will be held on

  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 717,84 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 63,33 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, o povolenie obnovy… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Miroslav Račko
    Defendant – Z. S.
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 246,35 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie výživného Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Úprava práv a povinností Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o nariadenie výchovného… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Zverenie do osobnej… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 12.800,00 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 2.899,62 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 2.899,62 € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného na plnoleté… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.