The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 78.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.
Number of Appellate Decisions – 114
Number of Affirmed Decisions – 90
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 73.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 79 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 17 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7.
This represents 21.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 110.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Indicators for 2015
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Indicators for 2013
Please note that some content pertaining judge indicators may not be translated.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on .
The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.