Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.
Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from family agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from family agenda.
We register 87.02% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 339 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 113.61% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 181 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 217 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 194.32. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 108 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 25.00% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 1218 days in the period and was assigned on average 92 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 49 – 61. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 93.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 210.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 188 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 73 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 38.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 99.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 812 days in the period and was assigned on average 70 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 31 from 40 possible points and ranked on 41 – 47. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 94.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 257 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 363 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 135 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 37.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 108% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2012:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.
The judge in this period worked 404 days and on average was assigned 228 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 87% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 2,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 0,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.
Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.