JUDr. Otília Doláková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bratislava I, we register 4,051 hearings and 2,194 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 15 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 10
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 3

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1357 days in the period and was assigned on average 16 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 11 from 40 possible points and ranked on 623 – 625. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 6.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 59.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 186
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 110

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 908.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 463 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 404 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 87.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 157.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 6
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 3

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 975 days in the period and was assigned on average 16 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 11 from 40 possible points and ranked on 699 – 705. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 143
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 86

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 11.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 650 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 538 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 321 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 59.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 92.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 2 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 595 days and on average was assigned 130 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 48,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 68
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 33

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 10,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 5,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 721 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 423 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 342 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 64,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 77% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 6,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 736. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 3,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 2,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – nezúčastnila sa
  • 2012 – nezúčastnila sa

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba o náhradu škody Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zmena úpravy výkonu… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva a ÚPP k mal.… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, náhradu škody na zdraví 27.476… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 12.500.- € s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR zaplatenie 310,57 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR zaplatenie 3.883,15 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie pohľadávky… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o náhradu škody Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva a ÚPP k mal.… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie výživného Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, úprava styku otca s malol.… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva a úprava… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zníženie výživného na maloleté… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, úprava výkonu rodičovských práv… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva a ÚPP k mal.… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva a ÚPP k… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR zaplatenie 24 207,60 € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, PR zaplatenie 15 333,38 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.