Mgr. Silvia Lesňáková

  1. Active vice chairman at the court Okresný súd Liptovský Mikuláš, we register 1,897 hearings and 1,884 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 73.41% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 173 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 113.54% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 160 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 218 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 251.089. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 82 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 46.34% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 601 days in the period and was assigned on average 32 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 65
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 47

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 132.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 97 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 53 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 54.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 131.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Majetok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie – Poriadok vo…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti životnému…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 221 ods.1, ods. 2… Hearing will be held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 289 ods. 1 TRZ Hearing will be held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 212/1,2 písm. b)… Hearing will be held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 189 ods.1, ods.… Hearing will be held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Krádež § 212/1a, 2a TZ Hearing will be held on

  6. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 221/1 TZ Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Liptovský Mikuláš
    Judge – Mgr. Silvia Lesňáková
    Defendants – P. A. and P. U.
  7. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 156/1a TZ Hearing will be held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 289/1 TZ Hearing will be held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin § 289/1 TZ Hearing will be held on

  10. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 348 ods. 1 písm.… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Podľa § 277 odsek 1 a §… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 348 odsek 1 písm.… Hearing was held on

  3. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 208/2, § 360/1 TZ Hearing was held on

  4. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Ublíženie na zdraví §… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, podľa § 221 ods.1, ods.… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, návrh na povolenie obnovy… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, návrh na zmenu spôsobu… Hearing was held on

  8. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Podľa § 289 odsek 1 TRZ Hearing was held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, podľa § 364 ods. 1/a… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Podmienečné prepustenie Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.