JUDr. Beáta Gešvantnerová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Prievidza, in the meantime we register no hearings and no judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.NA.

The judge worked 1582 days in the period and was assigned on average 73 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 30.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 22 – 27. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 398
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 335

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 15.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.4%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 188.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 99 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 47 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 47.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 154.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge did not issue judgements in any agenda dominantly..

The judge worked 1172 days in the period and was assigned on average 65 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 91 – 106. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 290
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 244

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 14.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 251 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 407 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 126 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 31% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 104.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2012:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 318 days and on average was assigned 110 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 60,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 43
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 26

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 4,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – Sudkyňou Okresného súdu Zvolen v období do 30. 06. 2012
  • 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen
  • 2011 – –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––; 2012 – Sudkyňou Okresného súdu Zvolen v období do 30. 06. 2012
  • 2011 – žiadna; 2012 – 26. – 27. 04. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov obvodu Krajského súdu v Banskej Bystrici, 21. – 22. 05. 2012 – pracovné stretnutie sudcov Okresného súdu Zvolen
  • 2011 – žiadna

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  2. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  3. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  5. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  6. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  7. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  8. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  10. Hlavné pojednávanie, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.