JUDr. Mária Hirjaková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Michalovce, we register 3,461 hearings and 3,511 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 21 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1456 days in the period and was assigned on average 115 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 21 from 40 possible points and ranked on 345 – 368. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 121
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 81

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 240.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 162 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 87 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 53.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 117.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1062 days in the period and was assigned on average 88 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 417 – 443. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 66.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 92
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 61

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 249 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 256 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 117 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 45.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 91.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 643 days and on average was assigned 158 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 55% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 40
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 22

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 210 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 208 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 72 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 31,9% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 94,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 22 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 318 – 330. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 6,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 15,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 6.12.2012 – odborný seminár sudcov (Krajský súd v Košiciach)
  • 2012 – 6.12.2012 – odborný seminár sudcov (Krajský súd v Košiciach)

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zákaz styku Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh otca o zmenu rozhodnutia… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zverenie do náhradnej osobnej… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, výživné pre dospelé dieťa Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zvýšenie výživného k… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie ústavnej… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zvýšenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, uloženie výchovného opatrenia Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, návrh na zrušenie vkladnej… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, nariadenie neodkladného… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na úpravu styku otca s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie menželského výživného Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh otca na zmenu úpravy… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, výživné pre dospelé dieťa Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného pre plnoleté… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie manželského výživného Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyhlásenie za mŕtveho Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.