Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
No agenda dominated in incoming cases for the judge during 2021. No agenda dominated in judge's decrees during 2021.
We register 68.95% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 409 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 104.82% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 215 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 239 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 243.102. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 150 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 68.00% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 895 days in the period and was assigned on average 43 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 27.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 69 – 80. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 75.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 12% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 247.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 235 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 145 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 61.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 192.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.
The judge worked 529 days in the period and was assigned on average 40 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 25 from 40 possible points and ranked on 214 – 237. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 79.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 384 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 739 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 289 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 39.1% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 102.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.
The judge in this period worked 138 days and on average was assigned 268 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 485 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 230 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 0,8% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 46,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.