JUDr. Martin Kopšo

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava IV, we register 2,818 hearings and 3,951 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 31 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is low.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from business agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from business agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 57.10% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 317 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 77.78% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 730 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 84 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 84. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 220 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 66.82% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1435 days in the period and was assigned on average 90 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 14.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 575 – 580. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 55.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 204
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 113

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 373.1 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 323 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 129 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 39.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 118.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1028 days in the period and was assigned on average 65 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 20.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 417 – 443. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 53% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 132
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 70

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 290 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 323 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 172 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 53.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 130.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 1.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 616 days and on average was assigned 138 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 40,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 64
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 26

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 4,5%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 356 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 274 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 175 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 52,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 124,3% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 14,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 636 – 644. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 2,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 12,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností – 2 dni
  • 2012 – 0; 2013 – Spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností – 2 dni
  • 2012 – 0

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 2 754,32 € s prísl. (upomínacie… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 10 926,29 € s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, žaloba na vypratanie… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, náhrada nemajetkovej ujmy Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, platobný rozkaz - 14.000,- € s… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyporiadanie BSM po rozvode Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 955 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na zaplatenie 1771,04… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na zaplatenie 1210,00 € s… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 305,72 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, bezdôvodné obohatenie Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 482,08 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 2 754,32 € s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  5. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, platobný rozkaz - 17 600,- € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, nahradenie prejavu vôle Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 10 926,29 € s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba na vypratanie… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, žaloba na zaplatenie 81,32 € s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.