Mgr. Magdaléna Andreánska

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Liptovský Mikuláš, we register 999 hearings and 816 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 26 years, 4 - ročný mandát.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 63.95% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 147 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 97.48% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 151 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 116 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 98.345. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 46 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 39.13% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 270 days in the period and was assigned on average 39 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 18.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 507 – 524. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 1.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 44% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 25
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 11

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 199 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 215 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 76 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 35.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 106.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 66 days and on average was assigned 255 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison

Judge position

Judgement agenda
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 41,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 17
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 7

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 11,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 6,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Vydržanie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 92.517,73 eur s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Predbežné prejednanie sporu, určenie, že nájomný vzťah trvá Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 470,54 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Určenie vlastníckého práva k… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o určenie vlastníckeho… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 489,35 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 2999,99 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o vyporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 92.517,73 eur s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  3. Predbežné prejednanie sporu, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na vydanie platobného… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie 372,50 EUR… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zruš. a vypor. podiel.… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  10. Predbežné prejednanie sporu, určenie, že nájomný vzťah trvá Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.