JUDr. Elena Lámerová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Brezno, we register 2,353 hearings and 2,336 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 16 years.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for about 20 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1552 days in the period and was assigned on average 93 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26 from 40 possible points and ranked on 113 – 132. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 177
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 128

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 106.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 78 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 9 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 11.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 109% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1108 days in the period and was assigned on average 70 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 25 from 40 possible points and ranked on 214 – 237. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 137
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 105

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 179 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 109 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 17 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 15.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 81% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 668 days and on average was assigned 156 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 74,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 94
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 70

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 10% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,6%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 149 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 104 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 29 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 25,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 109% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 28,5 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 54 – 64. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 9 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 19,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 29.04.2013–30.04.2013 – seminár (2 dni) "Európske rodinné právo"; 09.10.2013 – seminár (1 deň) "Rozvod (výška výživného, posudzovanie príjmov rodičov podnikateľov, nariadenie 4/2009 o vyživovacej povinnosti, BSM)"
  • 2012 – 09.02.2012 – 10.02.2012 – seminár (2 dni) – "Vzdelávanie sudcov vykonávajúcich agendu P"; 09.11.2012 – seminár (1 deň) – "Striedavá osobná starostlivosť, psychologické aspekty"
  • 2011 – Účasť na 2 seminároch organizovaných Justičnou akadémiou SR.; 2012 – 09.02.2012 – 10.02.2012 – seminár (2 dni) – "Vzdelávanie sudcov vykonávajúcich agendu P"; 09.11.2012 – seminár (1 deň) – "Striedavá osobná starostlivosť, psychologické aspekty"; 2013 – 29.04.2013–30.04.2013 – seminár (2 dni) "Európske rodinné právo"; 09.10.2013 – seminár (1 deň) "Rozvod (výška výživného, posudzovanie príjmov rodičov podnikateľov, nariadenie 4/2009 o vyživovacej povinnosti, BSM)"
  • 2011 – Účasť na 2 seminároch organizovaných Justičnou akadémiou SR.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva a úpravu… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na úpravu výkonu rodičovských… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva a úprava… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva a úprava… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena úpravy výkonu… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o rozvod manželstva a úpravu… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o novú úpravu styku s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o úpravu styku s malol. Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zmena rozhodnutia… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.