JUDr. Lýdia Lučivjanská

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 707 hearings and 921 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 20 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 446 days in the period and was assigned on average 34 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 17 from 40 possible points and ranked on 557 – 575. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 7.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 9.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 68% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 25
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 17

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 3.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 345 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 406 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 65 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 16% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 67.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 249 days and on average was assigned 256 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 68,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 22
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 15

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 6,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 3489 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Informácie o nevybavených prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 17.10.2012 – Technika pojednávania, konania na súde 12.–13.11.2012 – Výklad právnych úkonov a následky ich vád
  • 2012 – 17.10.2012 – Technika pojednávania, konania na súde 12.–13.11.2012 – Výklad právnych úkonov a následky ich vád
  • 2011 – Nástup po rodičovskej dovolenke 1.9.2011.
  • 2011 – Nástup po rodičovskej dovolenke 1.9.2011.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, vyporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 1.327,80 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 317.634,- Sk s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 1.452,24 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 60,60 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 1.401,43 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 2.062,57 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, (S)náhradu nemajetkovej újmy v… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 2.062,57 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, 840,- EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.