JUDr. Dana Macášková

  1. Active vice chairman at the court Okresný súd Trnava, we register 4,590 hearings and 3,824 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 22 years.
  2. The judge has been nominated to function for about 26 years, 4 - ročný mandát.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 81.25% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 368 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 102.07% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 309 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 197 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 190.844. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 160 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 40.00% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1452 days in the period and was assigned on average 46 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 99 – 112. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 83% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 264
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 219

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 340.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 289 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 205 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 70.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 192.5% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1031 days in the period and was assigned on average 40 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 23.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 286 – 303. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 196
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 165

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 371 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 700 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 226 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 32.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 91.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 2 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 617 days and on average was assigned 170 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 78,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 69
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 54

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 358 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 427 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 126 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 26,6% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 71,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 22,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 299 – 317. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11,25 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 11 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 13.–14.5.2013 –2 dni –Spotrebiteľské úvery, neprijateľné zmluvné podmienky –poslucháč 5.–7.6.2013 – 3 dni – Celokrajové školenie sudcov z obvodu KS v TT – poslucháč
  • 2012 – Z dôvodu zabezpečenia rovnomerného zaťaženia sudcov, v oddeleniach s najvyšším počtom nevybavených a reštančných vecí dočasne zastavený nápad, v oddelení sudkyne zastavený nápad agendy C od 1.10.2012, k 31.12.2012 ešte nespustený + zastavený nápad agendy P od 1.10.2012 do 4.12.2012.
  • 2012 – Z dôvodu zabezpečenia rovnomerného zaťaženia sudcov, v oddeleniach s najvyšším počtom nevybavených a reštančných vecí dočasne zastavený nápad, v oddelení sudkyne zastavený nápad agendy C od 1.10.2012, k 31.12.2012 ešte nespustený + zastavený nápad agendy P od 1.10.2012 do 4.12.2012.
  • 2012 – 23.–25.5. 3 dni Celokrajové školenie sudcov z obvodu KS v TT poslucháč
  • 2011 – 25.–27.5.– 3 dni – Celokrajové školenie sudcov obvodu KS v TT – poslucháč; 2012 – 23.–25.5. 3 dni Celokrajové školenie sudcov z obvodu KS v TT poslucháč; 2013 – 13.–14.5.2013 –2 dni –Spotrebiteľské úvery, neprijateľné zmluvné podmienky –poslucháč 5.–7.6.2013 – 3 dni – Celokrajové školenie sudcov z obvodu KS v TT – poslucháč
  • 2011 – 25.–27.5.– 3 dni – Celokrajové školenie sudcov obvodu KS v TT – poslucháč

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Pracovné právo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok pre zmeškanie – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vysporiadanie… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie PR o zaplatenie… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neúčinnosti zmluvy o… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 1300 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti skončenia… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie PR o zaplatenie… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 8.400,- Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o zaplatenie 699,05… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vydanie PR o zaplatenie 17… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, bezdôvodné obohatenie Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neúčinnosti zmluvy o… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydanie PR o zaplatenie 68,40… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Náhrada škody Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie bezpodielového… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Žaloba o zaplatenie 1 000,00… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vydanie PR o zaplatenie 104,25… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.