JUDr. Miroslav Radačovský

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Poprad, we register 2,089 hearings and 1,894 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1533 days in the period and was assigned on average 15 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 411 – 435. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 207
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 125

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 422.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 213 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 164 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 77% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 270.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1092 days in the period and was assigned on average 18 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 14.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 639 – 649. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 10 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 57.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 152
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 88

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 448 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 603 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 225 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 37.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 88.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 226 days and on average was assigned 101 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 65% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 20
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 13

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 8,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Opravné uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zapl. 1.137,06 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vysporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu škody s prísl. Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zapl. 1.137,06 € s prísl. Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zníženie výživného na plnoleté… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vysporiadanie BSM po rozvode… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vylúčenie z užívania… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie vlastníckého práva Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.