Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:
Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:
Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from family agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from family agenda.
We register 62.94% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 143 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 109.29% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 165 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 294 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 262.248. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 130 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 31.54% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 1512 days in the period and was assigned on average 123 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2017, the judge received in total 21.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 317 – 344. place of 651 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 68.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 212.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.
The judge had 214 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.
The judge had 67 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 31.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.
In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 94.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.
The judge worked 1086 days in the period and was assigned on average 86 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 28 from 40 possible points and ranked on 107 – 118. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 63.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 3.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 162 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 163 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 26 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 16% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 114.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.