JUDr. Jarmila Schromová

  1. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Prievidza, we register 2,634 hearings and 9,112 judgements.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 80.17% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 232 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 95.81% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 183 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 206 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 195.201. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 105 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 22.86% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1491 days in the period and was assigned on average 39 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 28 from 40 possible points and ranked on 62 – 68. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 83.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 176
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 147

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 187.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 73 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 33 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 45.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 149.5% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1058 days in the period and was assigned on average 35 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 29 from 40 possible points and ranked on 74 – 90. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 83.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 121
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 101

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 247 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 320 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 78 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 24.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 100.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 634 days and on average was assigned 161 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 83,7% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 49
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 41

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,3% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 0,9%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 285 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 249 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 220 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 72,6% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 120,8% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 23,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 241 – 252. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 13 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 10,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Celokrajské školenie sudcov z obvodu KS TN, 3.–4.10.2013, Omšenie – v postavení poslucháča
  • 2011 – –Posilnenie uplatňovania schengenského acquis a práva Eur. únie just. orgánmi SR (zahr. štud. cesta Štrasburg – Luxemburg, 27.02.–02.03.2011); Aplikácia nar. č. 2201/2003 o príslušnosti a uznávaní a výkone rozhodnutí vo veciach manželských a vo veciach rodičovskej zodpovednosti oboch manželov k deťom a nariadenie č. 4/2009 o vyživovacej povinnosti – JA SR Omšenie, 05.09.–06.09.2011; Školenie sudcov z obvodu KS Trenčín z obč.–právneho a obchodného úseku – IV MS SR Omšenie, 11.10–12.10.2011;, t.j. 7 pracovných dní v pozícii poslucháča ; 2013 – Celokrajské školenie sudcov z obvodu KS TN, 3.–4.10.2013, Omšenie – v postavení poslucháča
  • 2011 – –Posilnenie uplatňovania schengenského acquis a práva Eur. únie just. orgánmi SR (zahr. štud. cesta Štrasburg – Luxemburg, 27.02.–02.03.2011); Aplikácia nar. č. 2201/2003 o príslušnosti a uznávaní a výkone rozhodnutí vo veciach manželských a vo veciach rodičovskej zodpovednosti oboch manželov k deťom a nariadenie č. 4/2009 o vyživovacej povinnosti – JA SR Omšenie, 05.09.–06.09.2011; Školenie sudcov z obvodu KS Trenčín z obč.–právneho a obchodného úseku – IV MS SR Omšenie, 11.10–12.10.2011;, t.j. 7 pracovných dní v pozícii poslucháča

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti – Starostlivosť…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Vyživovacie povinnosti – Starostlivosť…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Rozvod
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, úprava styku Hearing was held on

  2. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, o zaplatenie 1467,56 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, neodkladné opatrenie-zmena… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, žaloba o vypratanie Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 500,95 eur s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o zaplatenie 159,66 €… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Návrh na rozvod manželstva a… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 56,92 eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zaplatenie 26 Eur Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, rozvod manželstva s prísl. Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.