Mgr. Adriana Szaniszlová

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 422 hearings and 2,281 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Košice II, in the meantime we register no hearings and no judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 20 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 59.80% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 296 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 66.02% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 322 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 1352 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 551.033. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 1155 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 30.39% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1484 days in the period and was assigned on average 12 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 61% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 200
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 122

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.8% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3.8% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 240.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 116 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 76 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 65.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 332.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1067 days in the period and was assigned on average 12 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 21 from 40 possible points and ranked on 390 – 416. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 16.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 55.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 139
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 77

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 237 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 379 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 113 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 29.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 102.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vypratanie bytu Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 77 000 € s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vyporiadanie bezpodielového… Hearing will be held on

  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, 100 Eur s prísl.… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, porušenie práv na ochranu… Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 1008,- eur Hearing will be held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Žaloba o zaplatenie 422,60 EUR… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1 197,99 Eur s prísl. Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 250 Eur s prísl. (Martin… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1 197,99 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 333,38 Eur s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, 61,00 EUR s prísl. Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o určenie vlastníctva Hearing was held on

  5. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, neplatnosť skončenia… Hearing was held on

  6. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, 2 825,01 Eur s prísl. Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 47102,4 EUR… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 21.015 Eur s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 2 449,77 Eur s prísl.… Hearing was held on

  10. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, neplatnosť skončenia… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.