JUDr. Mária Tvrdíková

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Bardejov, we register 231 hearings and 4,058 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Svidník, we register 3,427 hearings and 44 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 27 years, bez časového obmedzenia funkcie.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from civil agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 82.44% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 393 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 96.11% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 321 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 395 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 266.793. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 328 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 37.50% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2012:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 426 days and on average was assigned 199 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 67,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 43
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 29

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 5,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Pre sudcu evidujeme menej ako 20 rozhodnutí, preto jeho efektivitu nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Ochrana osobnosti
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o určenie, že… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Vyporiadanie BSM Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 12653,28 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 11 317,13 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o primerané finančné… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba na ochranu osobnosti Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba na ochranu osobnosti Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, NO o odsránenie neoprávnenej… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 7176,9 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o určenie povinnosti odstraniť… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 391,28 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o určenie… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o primerané finančné… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 16.825,09 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu škody a ochranu… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o primerané finančné… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 8052,27 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie 5 005,96… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.