JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Michalovce, we register 4,033 hearings and 3,449 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 17 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 71.31% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 488 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 115.85% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 66 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 285 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 318.365. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 50 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 48.00% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1497 days in the period and was assigned on average 21 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 26.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 99 – 112. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 17.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 72.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 365
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 263

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 15.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 144.7 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 111 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 58 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 52.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 154.7% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1110 days in the period and was assigned on average 16 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 238 – 261. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 9 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 73.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 241
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 178

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 15.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 259 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 426 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 139 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 32.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 102.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 670 days and on average was assigned 114 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 55,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 72
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 40

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 10,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 4,5%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 234 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 244 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 177 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 62,5% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 137,1% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 19,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 473 – 480. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 5,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 13,5 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2012 – 6.12.2012 – odborný seminár sudcov (Krajský súd v Košiciach)
  • 2012 – 6.12.2012 – odborný seminár sudcov (Krajský súd v Košiciach)

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – T. Z.
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin krádež §20, §… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendants – R. W. and X. G.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – U. O.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin krádež § 20, §… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – O. G.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin podvod § 221… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – M. C.
  6. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – O. D.
  7. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin podvod § 221… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – W. R.
  8. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin ohroz.pod… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – O. Z.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin ublíž. na… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – B. J.
  10. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – E. R.
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin ohroz.pod… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – I. G.
  2. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, ohroz.mrav.vých.mládeže… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendants – L. E. and R. M.
  3. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – I. D.
  4. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, Obžaloba Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – C. K.
  5. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, prečin… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendants – G. H., L. E., Q. E., and U. C.
  6. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin ublíž.na zdraví… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – H. J.
  7. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin ohroz.pod… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – O. Z.
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, prečin… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – Z. X.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zločin sexuálne… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendant – N. V.
  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zločin skrátenia dane a… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Michalovce
    Judge – JUDr. Stanislav Vojtko
    Defendants – B. Q., G. X., H. X., L. H., M. H., and V. H.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.