JUDr. Eliška Čonková

  1. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Trebišov, we register 3,474 hearings and 2,800 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1528 days in the period and was assigned on average 108 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 13 from 40 possible points and ranked on 603 – 606. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 1.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 51.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 143
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 74

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.9%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 290.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 288 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 145 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 50.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 111% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Family Agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Family Agenda.

The judge worked 1091 days in the period and was assigned on average 73 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 15 from 40 possible points and ranked on 623 – 638. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 3 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 12 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 50.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.3%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 107
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 54

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 7.6%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.5%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 265 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 258 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 63 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 24.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 79.8% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 658 days and on average was assigned 118 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 50% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 50
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 25

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,3%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 179 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 182 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 44 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 24,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod, ÚRPaP Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod, ÚRPaP Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, úprava výkonu rodičovských… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, neodkladné opatrenie a… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zvýšenie výživného na mal.… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie výživného Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, určenie výživného Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, úprava rodičovských práv a… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.