JUDr. René Milták

  1. Active vice chairman at the court Okresný súd Bratislava I, we register 2,597 hearings and 1,040 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 8 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014 and 2013.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 900 days in the period and was assigned on average 14 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 3.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 649. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 3.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 44.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 176
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 79

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 17.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 9.5% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 1261.6 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 356 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 309 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 86.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 109.6% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 1
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 461 days in the period and was assigned on average 24 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 735. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 1.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 3.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 46.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 80
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 37

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 10.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 5.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 690 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 478 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 329 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 68.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 83.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 42 days and on average was assigned 188 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 991 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Informácie o nevybavených prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Bezdôvodné obohatenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozhodnutie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie – Bezpodielové spoluvlastníctvo manželov
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie – Zodpovednosť za škodu pri výkone verejnej…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 727,87 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 219,08 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie platnosti zmluvy a… Hearing will be held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vydanie neoprávneného… Hearing will be held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 3.580,05 EUR s… Hearing will be held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu škody Hearing will be held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR zaplatenie 2816,88 Eur s… Hearing will be held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, na náhradu škody nemajetkovej… Hearing will be held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, O náhradu škody na zdraví Hearing will be held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, návrh na vydanie PR 288,14… Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o náhradu škody Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 727,87 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 219,08 Eur s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie platnosti zmluvy a… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, neplatnosť odvolania z… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 3.580,05 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o vydanie neoprávneného… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhradu škody Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, Žaloba o zaplatenie 2.493,84… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, na náhradu škody nemajetkovej… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.