JUDr. Vladimír Tamaškovič

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Nové Zámky, we register 3,068 hearings and 908 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 8 years.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 931 days in the period and was assigned on average 76 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 29 from 40 possible points and ranked on 41 – 48. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 84.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 130
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 110

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.4% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 97.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 99 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 38 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 38.4% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 106% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 496 days in the period and was assigned on average 44 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 31.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 31 – 40. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 19.5 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 82.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 52
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 43

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 76 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 71 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 21 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 29.6% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 106.2% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 39 days and on average was assigned 179 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 327 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Informácie o nevybavených prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o reštančných prípadoch považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o výkonnosti sudcu považujeme za málo reprezentatívne a preto ich neprezentujeme.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Published judgements

  1. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Trestný rozkaz – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 201 odsek 1, odsek 2… Hearing will be held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, návrh na obnovu konania Hearing will be held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 207 odsek 1 Tr. zák. Hearing will be held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 189 odsek 1,odsek 2… Hearing will be held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, písmeno b, odsek 3… Hearing will be held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 323 odsek 1 písmeno a… Hearing will be held on

  7. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 207 odsek 1 Tr. zák. Hearing will be held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 156 odsek 1 Tr. zák., §… Hearing will be held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 189 odsek 1, odsek 2… Hearing will be held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, obnova konania Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 172 odsek 1 písmeno c… Hearing was held on

  2. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 208 odsek 1 písmeno a… Hearing was held on

  3. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 194 odsek 1, odsek 2… Hearing was held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 213 odsek 1,odsek 4… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 188 odsek 1 Tr.zák.,§… Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 207 odsek 1,odsek 3… Hearing was held on

  7. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 158 Tr. zák. Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 207 odsek 1 Tr. zák. Hearing was held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, § 194 odsek 1,odsek 2… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, § 212 odsek 1,odsek 4… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.