JUDr. Marcela Kačmárová

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Trenčín, we register 1,331 hearings and 1,053 judgements.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 591 days in the period and was assigned on average 63 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 179 – 200. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 76.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 76
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 58

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 282.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 345 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 148 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 42.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 139.4% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 204 days in the period and was assigned on average 25 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 24.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 238 – 261. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 78.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 28
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 22

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 282 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 366 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 83 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 22.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 91.3% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Rozsudok – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Incidenčné spory
    Potvrdené, Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Rozsudok – Zmluva o dielo
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Zmenky
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Zmenky
    Potvrdené
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Zmenky
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 28.985,10 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, náhrada škody + PO Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o zaplatenie 859,2 EUR s… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR zaplatenie 540,- € s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR zaplatenie 168,25 € s… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 256.559,18 € s… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR zaplatenie 89.700,15 € s… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie popretej pohľadávky Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie popretej pohľadávky Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.