JUDr. Tibor Gál

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Brezno, we register 1,683 hearings and 2,624 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 15 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2011:

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1520 days in the period and was assigned on average 30 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 436 – 463. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 63.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 120
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 76

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 319.4 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 98 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 47 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 48% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 133.3% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1085 days in the period and was assigned on average 31 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 10 from 40 possible points and ranked on 708 – 711. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 6 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 4 out of 25 points

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 86
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 52

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 654 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 360 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 96 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 26.7% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 38.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 648 days and on average was assigned 251 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 54,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 51
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 28

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 3,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 485 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 336 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 119 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 28,3% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 42,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 14,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 636 – 644. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 5,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 9 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Účasť na 3 odborných seminároch (vzdelávacích aktivitách) organizovaných Justičnou akadémiou SR: 25.03.2013–27.03.2013 – seminár (3 dni) "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia"; 22.04.2013–23.04.2013 – seminár (2 dni) " Spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností"; 06.11.2013–08.11.2013 – seminár (3 dni) "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia"; Účasť na 1 odbornom seminári organizovaného Justičnou akadémiou ČR: 10.10.2013–11.10.2013 – seminár (2 dni) "European Cross–Border Procedures, resp. Európske cezhraničné konania"
  • 2013 – agenda C – nápad zastavený od 01.12.2013 do 31.12.2013 (Dodatok č.8 k Rozvrhu práce na rok 2013, Spr.998/2013)
  • 2013 – agenda C – nápad zastavený od 01.12.2013 do 31.12.2013 (Dodatok č.8 k Rozvrhu práce na rok 2013, Spr.998/2013)
  • 2012 – 24.10.2012 – 26.10.2012 – seminár (3 dni) – "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia" 21.03.2012 – 23.03.2012 – seminár (3 dni) – "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia"
  • 2011 – Účasť na 5 seminároch organizovaných Justičnou akadémiou SR.; 2012 – 24.10.2012 – 26.10.2012 – seminár (3 dni) – "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia" 21.03.2012 – 23.03.2012 – seminár (3 dni) – "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia"; 2013 – Účasť na 3 odborných seminároch (vzdelávacích aktivitách) organizovaných Justičnou akadémiou SR: 25.03.2013–27.03.2013 – seminár (3 dni) "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia"; 22.04.2013–23.04.2013 – seminár (2 dni) " Spory o vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam a kataster nehnuteľností"; 06.11.2013–08.11.2013 – seminár (3 dni) "Anglický jazyk – právnická terminológia"; Účasť na 1 odbornom seminári organizovaného Justičnou akadémiou ČR: 10.10.2013–11.10.2013 – seminár (2 dni) "European Cross–Border Procedures, resp. Európske cezhraničné konania"
  • 2011 – Účasť na 5 seminároch organizovaných Justičnou akadémiou SR.

Published judgements

  1. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Platobný rozkaz – Obchodné záväzkové vzťahy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Platobný rozkaz – Kúpna zmluva
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Platobný rozkaz – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Platobný rozkaz – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie vlastníckeho práva Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o ochranu osobnosti a náhradu… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR - zaplatenie 15 851,58 Eur… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vysporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR - zaplatenie 2.167,05 Eur… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, PR - zaplatenie 2 114,92 Eur… Hearing was held on

  8. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, o vydanie veci alebo… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, rozvod manželstva Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neplatnosti kúpnej… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.