The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 90% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
Number of Appellate Decisions – 100
Number of Affirmed Decisions – 90
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 19.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 391 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 104 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 78 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150.
This represents 75% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 136.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
Indicators for 2013
Please note that some content pertaining judge indicators may not be translated.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on .
The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.