Overall evaluation of the judge is average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.
We register 82.55% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%.
We register 298 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.
The judge had overal appointment of cases of 99.31% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 24 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 143 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.
Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 96.107. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 9 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 33.33% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.
We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.
Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:
The judge was not assigned to any agenda dominantly. The judge did not issue judgements in any agenda dominantly..
The judge worked 1054 days in the period and was assigned on average 70 cases per 100 days in main agendas.
In 2015, the judge received in total 30.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 48 – 53. place of 738 evaluated judges.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 77% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.3%.
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 71 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 53 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 13 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 24.5% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 102.6% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:
Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä agenda Starostlivosti o maloletých. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.
The judge in this period worked 641 days and on average was assigned 110 cases in 10 days in main agendas.
Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 63,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 65,5%.
Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 6,6% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 7,2%.
Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2,4%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 2,5%.
Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 108 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.
Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 79 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.
Sudca mal na konci roka 20 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 21,1% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.
Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 96,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.
Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 26,75 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 101 – 109. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 7,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 19 z 25.
Notes about the data obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.
We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.