JUDr. Zuzana Kučerová

  1. Active judicial council member at the court Krajský súd Bratislava, we register 749 hearings and 115 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Mestský súd Bratislava I, we register 1,220 hearings and 4 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for more than 21 years.

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 815 days in the period and was assigned on average 14 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 21.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 367 – 389. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 11 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 77% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 113
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 87

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 9.7% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 369 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 374 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 217 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 58% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 101.1% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2012 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Občiansko–právnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 402 days and on average was assigned 138 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 72,2% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 62,9%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 36
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 26

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 7,1% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,9%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 2%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,3%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 383 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 284 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 195 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 54,6% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 96,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 20,25 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 416 – 430. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 10,5 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 9,75 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Seminár –1 deň
  • 2012 – nezúčastnila sa; 2013 – Seminár –1 deň
  • 2012 – nezúčastnila sa

Published judgements

  1. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Spoluvlastníctvo
    Zastavujúce odvolacie konanie
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Zmluva o dielo
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Zmluvy
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Rozsudok – Neplatnosť právnych úkonov
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Zmeňujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Zmenené
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Zodpovednosť za škodu
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Zodpovednosť za škodu
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, vysporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, UK - zaplatenie 545,39 € s… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, Vydanie bezdôvodného… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vysporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, vysporiadanie BSM Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, UK - zaplatenie 381,80 € s… Hearing was held on

  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 166.444,30 Sk s… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zaplatenie 4.200,-€ s… Hearing was held on

  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, o určenie, že úver. zml.… Hearing was held on

  10. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, zrušenie a vyporiadanie… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.