Report in year 2011 – Sudca v hlavnej agende s prihliadnutím ku koeficientu zaťaženosti vybavil viac vecí ako priemer na súde. Uvádzaný celoslovenský priemer vybavenosti v agende C je do určitej miery nadsadený zrejme z dôvodov nekorektného zohľadnenia zaťaženosti v tejto agende oproti vedľajším agendám. Vybavenosť v agende P bola ovplyvnená nápadom vecí do oddelenia sudcu, až dňom 1.9.2011.
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.
The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 64.9% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.
Number of Appellate Decisions – 205
Number of Affirmed Decisions – 133
An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 16.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.
Of the total number of the judge's judgements 5.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.
Estimated average length of proceedings is 361 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.
The judge had 264 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.
The judge had 84 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150.
This represents 31.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.
In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 79.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.
Indicators for 2013
Please note that some content pertaining judge indicators may not be translated.
The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.
For the judge we register performance data for years 2011:
Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on .
The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.