Mgr. Peter Straka

  1. Active judge at the court Krajský súd Žilina, in the meantime we register no hearings and no judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Lučenec, we register 3,732 hearings and 3,206 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for about 11 years.

Close persons acknowledged in property declarations in years 2014, 2013, and 2012.

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2014:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2013:

Close persons acknowledged in property declaration in a year 2012:

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 1116 days in the period and was assigned on average 30 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 19 from 40 possible points and ranked on 436 – 463. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 14.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 60% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 70
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 42

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.7% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 320.2 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 186 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 104 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 55.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 181.2% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Občiansko–právna agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v agende Starostlivosti o maloletých.

The judge in this period worked 196 days and on average was assigned 123 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Evidujeme menej ako 10 odvolaní o rozhodnutiach sudcu, preto dáta považujeme za nereprezentatívne.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 415 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 142 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 17 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 11,7% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 51,9% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Dáta o kvalite a efektivite sudcu nepovažujeme za dostatočné, preto sudcu bodovo nehodnotíme.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – Sudca vykonáva funkciu sudcu od 12.02.2013.
  • 2013 – Sudca vykonáva funkciu sudcu od 12.02.2013.
  • 2013 – 14.03.2013 – Určovacie žaloby; 17.04.2013–19.04.2013 – Nemecký jazyk – právnická terminológia; 29.04.2013–30.04.2013– Európske rodinné právo;13.05.2013–14.05.2013 – Spotrebiteľské úvery; 20.06.2013–21.06.2013 – Ochrana osobnosti; 19.04.2013 – Občianskoprávne gréium; 25.04.2013–26.04.2013 – Pracovné stretnutie sudcov KSBB; 09.10.2013 – Konanie o rozvode; 16.09.2013–17.09.2013 – Profesionálna etika sudcu; 20.09.2013 – Tréning komunikácie; 24.09.2013 – Dokazovanie, doručovanie; 10.10.2013 – Prepisovanie, nahrávanie; 06.11.2013 – 08.11.2013 – Anglický jazyk; 19.11.2013 – Efektívne využitie počítača.
  • 2013 – 14.03.2013 – Určovacie žaloby; 17.04.2013–19.04.2013 – Nemecký jazyk – právnická terminológia; 29.04.2013–30.04.2013– Európske rodinné právo;13.05.2013–14.05.2013 – Spotrebiteľské úvery; 20.06.2013–21.06.2013 – Ochrana osobnosti; 19.04.2013 – Občianskoprávne gréium; 25.04.2013–26.04.2013 – Pracovné stretnutie sudcov KSBB; 09.10.2013 – Konanie o rozvode; 16.09.2013–17.09.2013 – Profesionálna etika sudcu; 20.09.2013 – Tréning komunikácie; 24.09.2013 – Dokazovanie, doručovanie; 10.10.2013 – Prepisovanie, nahrávanie; 06.11.2013 – 08.11.2013 – Anglický jazyk; 19.11.2013 – Efektívne využitie počítača.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Osvojenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, určenie neúčinnosti kúpnej… Hearing was held on

  2. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zrušenie a vysporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, uplatnenie predkupného práva… Hearing was held on

  4. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Obmedzenie spôsobilosti na… Hearing was held on

  5. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 1 063,68 € s… Hearing was held on

  6. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, Žaloba o náhradu škody… Hearing was held on

  7. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, bezdôvodné obohatenie -… Hearing was held on

  8. Vyhlásenie rozsudku, určenie neplatnosti Dohody o zrážkach… Hearing was held on

  9. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, zaplatenie 16.480,27 € s… Hearing was held on

  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, o zaplatenie 19519,6 Eur s… Hearing was held on

More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.